Don`t erase the contrast

I`ve always been fascinated by contrasts.
Everyone is I think.
So, I often like to look for it and to put it in what I do (holding in mind that contrast could be not caught if it is not built on a base of coherence. And that`s a contrst too, i`m afraid).

On one hand, postmodernism made us well aquainted with contrasts, and trained our senses in dealing with several inputs all at once. Sometimes they are so many and so fragmented that it ends up feeling like lying on a single stream.

So perhaps the ability to be effective and to create effective communication lies in removing rather than putting on. I had this impression during my acting studies and I keep on having it now, stronger than ever. I want to communicate something, so I`ll convey one intention, linked to a specific state of mind (which is often a stereotype of thought). I AM, e.g., sad, I don`t want to do the one that is sad. Again, I want to create spaces, I don`t want to fill in a space.

In addition, not only is the significate generated by his definition, but also by being different from the others significates in a system.

I would like these to be my key words: erase and contrast.

But rules are made to be broken, if not they would not be rules, wouldn`t they?